RCMP Officers marching regarding the bullying and harassment class action filedAn RCMP class action lawsuit alleging a “toxic” work environment within the policing organization, including workplace harassment and bullying has been certified by a federal court.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) reportedly faced two workplace harassment reports before this bullying and harassment class action lawsuit was filed in 2018. In addition, over 15 reviews of the organization’s alleged dysfunctional culture were conducted identifying more than 200 recommendations for reform. Only a few have been implemented.

The Class that was recently certified by Justice McDonald includes all current and former RCMP members, including civilian members, special constables, reservists, recruits, and all regular members. In addition, the certified Class includes Public Service Employees ineligible to participate in grievance procedures under the Federal Sector Labor Relations Act. Others who worked at the RCMP are included as well.

“The plaintiffs claim that the RCMP leadership fostered and condoned a culture of bullying, intimidation, and general harassment for decades, creating a toxic workplace characterized by abuse of power and fear of reprisal,” states the plaintiff lawyers’ website. “The plaintiffs further claim that statutory and institutional barriers prevented RCMP Members from engaging in collective bargaining and/or obtaining other meaningful redress for their grievances.”

According to the plaintiffs’ lawyer, the problem starts at the top. The RCMP class action lawsuit alleges that due to the toxic workplace, those who were subject to bullying, intimidation and harassment were unable to report problems through the chain of command. Additionally, the victims of the toxic work environment suffered from both physical and emotional injuries including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety. Further, the plaintiffs claim that their careers suffered because they lost promotion and early retirement opportunities from direct and indirect retaliatory actions against them.

The RCMP class action lawsuit was certified at $1.1 billion. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and allege that the RCMP violated its statutory, contractual, and common law duties to Class Members.

The RCMP attempted to counter the move to certify the class action lawsuit, pointing out that it had implemented updates to its internal processes in 2014 to address the harassment problem after a series of sexual harassment reports.

“The RCMP internal processes do not appear to be equipped to provide redress or compensation for negatively impacted career paths or harm to the family members impacted by the alleged conduct.  Therefore, the internal processes may not be able to provide an appropriate remedy, or any remedy at all, for some of the claims advanced. Finally, the internal processes and how they are, or are not administered, forms a core component of the claims advanced by the Plaintiffs,” wrote the judge in her order certifying the Class.

What do you think about the allegations of a toxic workplace environment in the RCMP class action lawsuit? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below!

The plaintiffs and certified Class are represented by Megan B. McPhee, Won J. Kim, Rachael Sider and Aris Gyamfi of Kim Spencer McPhee Barristers P.C.

The RCMP Class Action Lawsuit is Geoffrey Greenwood, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, Case No. T-1201-18 in Toronto Federal Court, Canada.

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.


  • Donna Harrison March 21, 2021

    I have been keeping track of the public service harassment law suit and want to be included. Hopefully I am not too late in contacting you.

  • rocco February 12, 2021

    add me

  • Al September 28, 2020

    House can I be a part of this lawsuit? I have experienced many years of harassment and bullying in the RCMP. I was a regular member for 9 years and was threatened to take a medical retirement.

    • Al September 28, 2020


  • A.C.F.(Gus)MacKay March 24, 2020

    I would like to be included in this class action suit. I was a regular member and served my full 35 years. Through those years I experienced periods of harassment of which I can provide details. I would like to be added to this please provide me with details on how to go about this. Thank you.

  • Elizabeth March 17, 2020

    Public Servant. Working at Headquarters.

  • Elizabeth February 18, 2020

    From 2011 to 2014 I was a victim of the bullying, harassing and unprecedented ill-treatment from RCMP Director, Manager, HR Representative. Due to an accident I had, not at work, I was not able to secure my employment. I was not offered any help from these individuals either. In fact, as of recent, I learned that payroll, management did not file my accident and employment properly in 2013/2014 and now I am expected to prove or disprove this. I am permanently disabled. Forced to early disability retirement until age 65. It was quite the treatment received at an extremely difficult time in my life. And it seems to continue, despite the fact that I’ve not been able to work since 2014.

    • Marie-Hélène March 4, 2020

      Would you be so kind to ask Elizabeth if she was a public servant at the time, or regular member? I have a similar experience with RCMP (C Division – Quebec) and currently still, after 4 years, defending the validity of my professional work accident – though recognized by provincial CNESST – in front the Labor Court of Quebec because RCMP don’t want to recognize my case as harassment, intimidation, physical and verbal violence, as per described in the Canadian Labor Act (Health and Security Rules). I’m a public servant with 25 years seniority. The events happened from 2013 to 2014. My grievance was rejected, my complaints against 12 people (regular members and public servants) were ridiculed.

      • Elizabeth March 17, 2020

        Public Servant. Working at Headquarters.

  • Kenneth shadrick February 11, 2020

    Add me

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts