Novalpina Capital owns Israel-based military spyware manufacturer NSO Group © Amir Cohen/Reuters
Novalpina Capital LLP updates
Sign up to myFT Daily Digest to be the first to know about Novalpina Capital LLP news.
Accessibility helpSkip to content
Need help?
The private equity firm that owns the military spyware manufacturer NSO Group has been stripped of control of its own fund after a dispute between its co-founders.
Investors in Novalpina Capital’s €1bn fund voted this month to seize control after a tense three-hour video call, people involved in the process said. The dramatic intervention leaves the ownership of the firm behind the spying software Pegasus hanging in the balance.
The fund owns Israel-based NSO as well as the Estonian gambling company Olympic Entertainment Group and the French pharmaceutical business Laboratoire X.O.
Its investors, which include public pension funds, have until August 6 to decide whether to liquidate the fund with a fire sale of its assets, or appoint a third party to take control of it.
A third party would be expected to return any unspent capital to the investors and sell the companies over a longer period, potentially for a higher price. If investors representing three-quarters of the fund’s value cannot agree, the fund will be liquidated.
The vote to strip Novalpina of control of the fund was the culmination of months of turmoil at the private equity firm amid disagreements between its co-founders, Stephen Peel, Bastian Lueken and Stefan Kowski, people involved in the process said.
At the meeting this month, each of the three had set out his position, after which investors concluded the men could not continue to run the fund together and should be removed from its operations, a person present said.
“Clearly something has gone very wrong in the relationship” between the firm’s co-founders, the person said, describing the meeting as “peculiar and painful”, but declining to give further details.
Peel declined to comment. Lueken, Kowski and NSO did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
NSO, the most controversial company owned by Novalpina, has been at the centre of several spying controversies over the past few years.
Most recently, its Pegasus spyware tool was linked to phones belonging to dozens of journalists, human rights activists and politicians, according to an investigation by a consortium of newspapers. The software, which requires an Israeli government licence for export because it is viewed as a weapon, turns phones into listening devices and enables access to their encrypted contents.
Stephen Peel, a former partner at TPG, resigned from the board of human rights group Global Witness in early 2019 after investing in NSO.
His wife Yana Peel resigned as chief executive of London’s Serpentine Galleries, which she had described as her “dream job”, over Novalpina’s links to NSO.
The investor rebellion was first reported by Sky News.
Get alerts on Novalpina Capital LLP when a new story is published

Promoted Content

Comment guidelines
Please keep comments respectful. Use plain English for our global readership and avoid using phrasing that could be misinterpreted as offensive. By commenting, you agree to abide by our community guidelines and these terms and conditions. We encourage you to report inappropriate comments.

How ironic it would be if it turned out that the founders of Novalpina spied on each other with Pegasus! That would be poetic justice maxed out. Something like seeing Softbank executives relegated to a WeWork co-working space!
Gambling, drugs and spying. What could possibly go wrong with a portfolio like that?
Raising a €1bn fund as your inaugural one is excellent work; managing to destroy it within a couple of years before you are anywhere near fully invested is truly special! 

From what I hear, couldn't happen to three nicer guys
(Edited)
"Novalpina Capital has control of the Board of NSO. We own approximately two-thirds of the holding company of NSO (Square 2 S.a.r.l.) and have appointed the majority of Board Directors. Novalpina appointees are:
  • Mickael Betito (Novalpina Capital);
  • Zamir Dahbash (Shalom Tel Aviv);
  • Stefan Kowski (Novalpina Capital);
  • Stephen Peel (Novalpina Capital);
  • Günter Schmid (KERBEROS Compliance); and
  • Gerhard Schmidt (Weil)."
A detail worth knowing.
 In reply to Cpl. Jones
Interesting - Kerberos Compliance was co-founded by one of the Tipico founders, Germany‘s leading sports gambling operator. It performs the compliance function at Tipico which - surprise, surprise given the shareholder background - it didn’t do very well and allowed for a lot of shady dealings. Positively, they have been now appointed to lead the restructuring of the compliance function at Tipico :) 

Not surprisingly, they didn’t do a Great Job here either. They are the kind of compliance firm you hire if you want to allow for as much dirty business as possible
 In reply to TheHeMan
So Tipico is similar to Olympic Entertainment Group? I wonder if Kerberos also runs compliance there...
 In reply to TheHeMan
Must have been in charge of compliance at Wirecard as well! 
 In reply to Cpl. Jones
Brilliant!!  So likely LPs pulled the plug as GP went off strategy? Wish FT could learn something more, they seem to be rather stuck with Wirecard and Germany, while there is so much more beauty in London and NY to be exposed!!!
 In reply to Cpl. Jones
TorreyCove certainly did a great job. No surprise they’ve been bought by Aksia; the experts in responsible insights.
The investors in PE funds, known as “LPs” typically have the right to eject the fund manager, known as the “GP”, in certain circumstances or sometimes as part of a ‘no-fault divorce’ but it rarely happens. So, the situation must have been quite bad for the LPs to actually pull the trigger. Unfortunately, the article does not give the actual reason for the GP dismissal, however, we can guess it may have been a breach of investment restrictions, like a ban on investment in weapons, which the NSO product is considered to be. Many public pension fund LPs will include specific off limits investment areas in the investment agreement with the GP banning sectors like weapons, gambling, hard alcohol, etc. More insight into specifically what happened here would be interesting. 
 In reply to Runinplace
Exactly - it would be good to see these gaps in information acknowledged if not filled.
 In reply to Cpl. Jones
Purchase Pegasus perhaps?
 In reply to Runinplace
No, probably key man issues.
A little too audacious... Maybe McKinsey/BCG forgot to flag in the commercial DD the dangers of spying on governments, extremely powerful people... and of competition with States / intelligence agencies... Unfortunate outcome... Wish them the best!
Blood on their hands.
 In reply to major major major major
God knows how much 
 In reply to Greg Rogers
Definitely at least that of Khashoggi. And God knows how many else have died due to their working for MbS the murderous, as well as the dictators of Rwanda, Abu Dhabi, and goodness knows where else.
But, FT, I thought investors in PE funds are supposed to innocent sheep with no information or ability to exercise governance over these “masters of the universe”? 
Or is the reality that they actually do know what they’re doing,  and not only can, but do, exercise good governance over the managers of these funds only have relevance when it’s in a negative piece about the industry. 
(Edited)
see OIC recommendation to invest and compare
 In reply to HaMelech George (KKL)
Edit was to remove quotes from the publicly available document. Would be interesting to read about what other LPs (like South Yorkshire Pensions Authority) and placement agent (Park Hill - according to OIC doc) have to say on this.  
 In reply to HaMelech George (KKL)
Here is the SEC marketing document - guess $14.85 million in fees will make a lot of qualms disappear. Although to be fair, when they marketed the fund, I presume they didn't know what the fund would be investing in

I would love to see what they said about themselves in their marketing materials...
Excellent news. Now how about implementing an ethical investment policy?

Follow the topics in this article